Home
08 | 09 | 2010
Best Investors
Distressed News
Insider Buying
Leading Indicators
Home
Beter Bed NV, Modelling the Value
DCF assessment - Small-Cap DCF
Written by Peter van der Lely   
Monday, 25 January 2010 15:54

  Beter Bed has a history of outperforming expectations.
The solid trading statement of the 22th of january 2010, attracted our attention.
Cash flow generation and Balance sheet development is strong. Valuation doesn't appear to be demanding.

Please, check the Google Search counter which counts the volume of google search applications regarding the term "beter bed".
This, in turn, might give an indication of consumer interest in the beter bed products.
You can adjust the search counter to your own needs by term, period and region/country.
Powered by Google.com

Please use the sheet to your own insight and manage your own expectations and conclusions.

disclaimer

about Equitycatwalk


the author has no position in this stock at the moment of publishing

 
Amazon.com: the power of the market risk premium
DCF assessment - Large-Cap DCF
Written by Peter van der Lely   
Thursday, 21 January 2010 22:39

  The 25th of March 2009, we wrote:

DCF modelling: current balance sheet strong. Financial gearing very low. Also Goodwill is low. The 13th of February, S&P upgraded Amazon's credit rating to investment grade.
As you can see from the DCF sheet, the cash conversion is high and the capital intensity low because Amazon is managing it's working capital very, very efficiently.
Amazon clients pay first, after which Amazon pays its supplier. This way, accounts payable has become a big item for Amazon.com and ROIC is very high.

P&L: in historic perspective revenue growth of 20% is conservative, but absolutely a 20% CAGR for revenues is immense as is the 12% perpetuity growth rate).
For an assessment also see the last lines and graphs of the simulation sheet.
I think for the next 3 years the market is more conservative regarding the growth perspective of Amazon. Margins forecast neutral and again the market risk premium for the DCF calculation
is very conservative with a current market risk premium of 8%.
In general regarding the forecast lines, the calculation is straightforward: we used the ratios of the last historical year or the median of the 10yr history.
We think this is a very well applicable regarding a homogeneous business which is growing on an autonomous base.



SIMULATION and SENSITIVITY
Margin improvement a strong factor driving the target price after the market risk premium.
If Amazon manages to keep up its pants through the recession, and the market risk premium normalizes to e.g. 6%, it might be a profitable investment.
We're curious how well the operational leverage is playing out regarding the margins. All in all, if you grow your business +10% every year, this should help the margins.
Having said that, from a current perspective we don't see why to become much more aggressive regarding the markets than the 10yr average forecast of 4.7%.
This is a clear improvement from the margins of the last three years (3,6%, 4.4% and 4.4%). Also, new business development will pressure aggressive margin development.

Again, conservative (high) forecasts for the market risk premium (8%). We refer to the equity market risk premium with respect to the discounted market earnings in equilibrium with the current market valuation. This is an ex-ante approach which we prefer to use in forecasting models.
We do expect however that it is not realistic to assume a return of the market risk premium to pre-crisis levels (2-5%), because of the changing credit supply and risk perception. Also the default risk in general has increased significantly.


All in all reading the sheets we see a very, very profitable business and a very profitable business model. We wouldn't say Amazon is deeply undervalued or an investor wonderstory.
We also see a lot of growth and profits in the future, but so does the market. Ofcourse this is our personal point of view. Please, use the sheet in line with your own convictions.

20th January 2010:

With the knowledge we have now regarding the decline of the ex-ante market risk premium from 8%  (march 2009) to 4.7% now (January 2010), we adjusted the WACC input accordingly. To no surprise, this results in a noticeable surge in the target price/value per share. The surge is in line with expectations derived from the SENSITIVITY analysis (see SENSITIVITY worksheet)  we ran in march 2009 (correct for the 30bp increase in the riskless debt yield).

Above all, while it’s hard to forecast the future development of the market risk premium, we have used a methodology to derive the impact of a possible movement.
Please be aware that Amazon.com results and the market risk premium are not correlated (in the latest crash situation). Otherwise a back to normal movement in the market risk premium would have been accompanied by a lowering of the earnings estimates. The SENSITIVITY analysis does show the trade off between market risk premium and company results vs target price.


disclaimer

about Equitycatwalk


the author has no position in this stock at the moment of publishing

 
More room for Equity: RiskPremium has further to fall
Other analyses - Other analyses
Written by Peter van der Lely   
Tuesday, 10 November 2009 11:47

We don’t think the stockmarket has gotten ahead of itself.
After the steep decline of the market-riskpremium, the focus of stockmarket investors is changing to earnings confirmation. That bodes well for the near future.

If we take a closer look at the equity-riskpremium (ERP or MRP) of the S&P 500, the ex-ante or forward looking premium, decreased  from it's high of 8% (feb 2009)  to about 6% (beginning of May 2009) to a rounded 5% (4.93%) by august and 4.71% by November 2009.

So, the current MRP is about 30bp below the MRP-high (5%) at the high of the .com crash. Within 1 year, that level declined to 3.5%. After something more than 1.5 year the MRP declined even further, to under 3%.

From this we conclude that although we are seeing a decrease in the speed of decline in the MRP, there still is ample room to decline even further. Because of the heavy weighting of the MRP on the stockmarket valuation case, this means further upward potential.

The character of the stockmarket is changing: When the MRP normalizes, like we are experiencing now and the speed of the MRP decline reduces, investors expect earnings estimates to stabilize or bottom out.

And that’s exactly the confirmation we get from the market right now. This confirmation will continue to improve the risk assessment of stocks. This will have a positive impact on the MRP (read: further decline), which in historic perspective, has room to decline further.
That’s why we’re positive about the stockmarkets in general. We do not foresee a correction is eminent from a value perspective.


note: It is not unusual for stock's dcf valuation to have a 30% sensitivity regarding a 100bp change in the MRP.

disclaimer

about Equitycatwalk

 
Wavin NV, modelling before the possible revenue improvement
DCF assessment - Small-Cap DCF
Written by Peter van der Lely   
Monday, 16 November 2009 12:21

 Wavin's stockprice increased more than 50% since our last analysis of the 6th of July: "modelling the rights issue". This is mainly the result of a lower WACC (RiskPremium).  To a lesser extend there was the influence of the bottoming out of earnings estimates. Also take note of the phenomenon that a stockprice only will profit from a lower RiskPremium, if consensus earnings estimates (at least) have bottomed out.

New valuation potential especially weights on better than expected earnings and/or corporate action possibilities. Wavin’s current stockprice is more in line with it’s valuation potential then was the case at the 6th of July. From a M&A (target) perspective, the improvement in margins is good news.

For our thoughts about the RiskPremium, please check our last article: it’s potential for a further decrease is falling, although there is still room left. Investor focus is more and more weighted to earnings.

Wavin’s substantial improvement in margins can set the stage for an improvement in earnings estimates based on further margin improvement and/or revenue surprises. The revenue comparative base is becoming very undemanding from the last quarter of the year. From our perspective, the revenue growth has the potential to become a big (positive) swing factor from the last quarter onward.


disclaimer

about Equitycatwalk

the author has a position in this stock at the moment of publishing



 
long short windmill check
DCF assessment - Large-Cap DCF
Written by Peter van der Lely   
Tuesday, 29 September 2009 13:39

  This analysis presents a comparison of Vestas and NORDEX AG.
We have used conditional formatting and a (median) forward and backward looking comparison between the accounting statements and assumptions regarding Vestas and NORDEX.

Please, use your own estimates and convictions regarding the assessment of the Vestas vs NORDEX discount/premium gap.

disclaimer

about Equitycatwalk

the author has no position in both stocks at the moment of publishing



 
« StartPrev1234567NextEnd »

Page 1 of 7